I think Apple could be saving the 6 core Coffee Lake MacBook Pros for after they have released a 3rd generation of the present design. I think it's inevitable that a MacBook Pro with 4 cores and the Radeon graphics package will appear and I'd say it'll be sooner than later.
Apple wwdc macbook pro kaby lake windows#
And it makes sense - six-core CPUs provide a much smaller benefit for most games as opposed to working in a multitude of apps.Ĭoffee Lake mobile CPUs are not even announced yet whereas Windows laptops equipped with Kaby Lake G CPUs are starting to appear and will continue doing so in the first half of this year. We'll have to wait until Vega Mobile is launched before we can say for sure though.Īs I see it, and as Intel markets them, G-series chips are aimed at comparably thin and light gaming notebooks, not at MacBook Pro type ones.
Apple may be an exception here, but I'm not convinced yet that the actual efficiency gains are as high as Intel claims.
Apple wwdc macbook pro kaby lake Pc#
And with even higher prices, most PC OEMs would rather go the traditional route. From what I gather, these chips are already at least as expensive as a separate CPU and GTX1050, so if Intel made six-core versions soon, they'd need to price them even higher, otherwise those quad-core versions would instantly be redundant. A six-core chip with the same TDP as current quad-cores would certainly help with that.Īnd don't get me wrong - I'd love to see a six-core G-series chip, I just can't see it happening. Most people seem to say "throttling" as soon as a notebook can't keep the maximum turbo frequenzy forever, but that's pretty much any notebook. While the video is rendering, yes, but not while working on it.Īlso I think the word "throttling" is thrown around far too much lately. I guess you're right, but even video editing doesn't constantly stress the CPU and GPU to a 100% for longer periods of time. If an opportunity to make one part smaller in exchange for improving cooling, batteries, and much else existed, I'm not sure why we wouldn't want that. And if you look at an iMac that benchmarks similar to it, you can see how the macbook throttles down over time and is slower in the long run despite a similar benchmark score in the short run.
The extra PSU wattage is one for overprovisioning as they lower in efficiency over time, and two probably for plugged in peripherals, the GPU and CPU in their throttled state cannot keep using 89W because they hit temperature limits first.Īs for not having much use for both the CPU and GPU over time - well, I'd wonder why one is getting a 15" comparably large and expensive system? Video editors are certainly a core demographic and long exports over dozens of minutes or longer certainly do use both chips. Look at the power consumption figures, even including everything else in the system it's not drawing the 89W you claimed (drawing 51W on the witcher 3, certainly loading both chips, and that's including powering the screen and all), and after the first few tests throttles down By TDP I'm referring to the power use the CPU + GPU settle down on that the heatsink and fans can dissipate constantly. It's supplying power to a lot more than the CPU and GPU - the screen, antennas, chipsets, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
